A) You post a nearly 11MB movie somewhere that gives it back at a maddening 40KB/s.
B) Your purloined iTunes soundtrack is sanctimoniously withheld from anyone who didn’t purchase it themself, so the bloody things is a silent movie. I think we know why YouTube was uppity.
C) It’s a generous spirit who would go to such lengths to so come to the aid and comfort of one so in need … Bravo.
D) If only the intended is able to retrieve it, given A & B above …
Shifting realities, Jennifer … Ever notice a post that looks just like the one you looked at in the morning has a new picture or something later in the day? Well, the sands run deeper than that, even. The movie I “reviewed” early on n’existe pas ici (and was even cooler). But it had some … technical difficulties. That’s A & B.
C, Debbie’s in need (my assertion/observation), remote from her clan and her man, and Knighted Good Sir Michael is reaching out (my assertion/observation). I could be so way off base, though, that it ain’t even baseball. Love the collection of faces, though.
D, I may be the only other one who ever saw the first movie and thus characteristically merely blathering in the trackless wilderness …
Thanks! And, Adam, what in the world did Michael mean about keeping himself in suspense? (I’m asking you because Michael never does answer questions, even if you ask twice. Although he does spontaneously share some pretty startlingly personal items sometimes.)
I’m as clueless as the next blogee, but I took it to mean the way out of the corner into which he’d painted himself was unclear at the time (the solution seems to have been exit for another room entirely, bringing only his can of paint … ). IOW, the first movie wasn’t working out and he wasn’t sure what would in the end be released.
Not that mystery ain’t good for the soul, but could we get at least a monosyllabic, “Yup, nope, duh … “, oh b-meister?
Now I feel ganged-up on. I can mostly handle (read: ignore) Jennifer, but not the both of you.
You’re correct about all your assumptions. I had fits creating those simple dangling photos because I never could find music that felt right for the series of expressions. And when the tunes synched with the pics it turned out they were protected riffs. PIsser. However, I’ve another one (different still from what you saw) that I’ll post later today or tomorrow. This new one I really like.
A) You post a nearly 11MB movie somewhere that gives it back at a maddening 40KB/s.
B) Your purloined iTunes soundtrack is sanctimoniously withheld from anyone who didn’t purchase it themself, so the bloody things is a silent movie. I think we know why YouTube was uppity.
C) It’s a generous spirit who would go to such lengths to so come to the aid and comfort of one so in need … Bravo.
D) If only the intended is able to retrieve it, given A & B above …
you’re keeping me in such suspense here! i have no idea what this is about, but im excited haha
I’m keeping myself in suspense.
hahaha i like!
Mindbogglingly cool!
(I didn’t even know that is was supposed to have sound, since I don’t get sound on this computer anyway).
That was pretty cool. I assume you didn’t create the background … right?
Adam, can you explain A, B, and especially C? Too cryptic for me. (Who’s the generous spirit, and who’s in need?)
Shifting realities, Jennifer … Ever notice a post that looks just like the one you looked at in the morning has a new picture or something later in the day? Well, the sands run deeper than that, even. The movie I “reviewed” early on n’existe pas ici (and was even cooler). But it had some … technical difficulties. That’s A & B.
C, Debbie’s in need (my assertion/observation), remote from her clan and her man, and Knighted Good Sir Michael is reaching out (my assertion/observation). I could be so way off base, though, that it ain’t even baseball. Love the collection of faces, though.
D, I may be the only other one who ever saw the first movie and thus characteristically merely blathering in the trackless wilderness …
Thanks! And, Adam, what in the world did Michael mean about keeping himself in suspense? (I’m asking you because Michael never does answer questions, even if you ask twice. Although he does spontaneously share some pretty startlingly personal items sometimes.)
I’m as clueless as the next blogee, but I took it to mean the way out of the corner into which he’d painted himself was unclear at the time (the solution seems to have been exit for another room entirely, bringing only his can of paint … ). IOW, the first movie wasn’t working out and he wasn’t sure what would in the end be released.
Not that mystery ain’t good for the soul, but could we get at least a monosyllabic, “Yup, nope, duh … “, oh b-meister?
Now I feel ganged-up on. I can mostly handle (read: ignore) Jennifer, but not the both of you.
You’re correct about all your assumptions. I had fits creating those simple dangling photos because I never could find music that felt right for the series of expressions. And when the tunes synched with the pics it turned out they were protected riffs. PIsser. However, I’ve another one (different still from what you saw) that I’ll post later today or tomorrow. This new one I really like.
That was fun, Adam. Let’s do it again sometime.